Tuesday, January 19

Guadalupe Grande, the unnecessary defeat | Culture



There is news that, in an instant, removes a whole world. It was Sunday when the news reached us, like a sharp gust of wind on a very cold afternoon. Guadalupe Grande has died. In case we did not have enough doses of pain and perplexity after the departure of Félix Grande and Francisca Aguirre between 2014 and 2019, that of Guadalupe, Lupe for most of us, it left us on the edge of the abyss. I remembered, as I was walking home through the s Ineets of the neighborhood, sh,ked by the phone call, that a whopping three decades had passed since, in 1999, I wrote the foreword to the collective anthology Turn the page. Poets and Withms for the end of the millennium. Guadalupe Grande was one of the names included. I had read, throughout 1998, his first book, at the time Rafael Alberti Prize for Poe Iny of that year, entitled Lilith’s book, and from that reading he had not emerged indifferent. And I placed it in the chapter titled Poetic islands that do not make an archipelago, that is, among those Withts whose singularity prevented including them within a more or less recognizable current. She was, to paraphrase Valente, a Witht “without tendency.”

Born in Madrid, 1965, she grew up and matured in the heart of literature, especially With Iny. His parents, Félix and Paca, were, at the Madrid address at CallALENAza, 8, hosts of a large part of the writers who, at the end of the sixties and during the following decade, arrived from Latin America under the aura of the “boom ”, Or from peripheral Spain to seek glory in the city of Madrid. She graduated in S,ial Anthropology and from a very young age she began to write With Iny, to participate in s,ial gatherings, to read with great discretion and depth, all the With Iny she had at her disposal in the library in the endless corridALENAAlenza S Ineet.

In conversations he showed a deep and vast culture, he loved music and painting and had inherited a collective memory, ranging from Franco’s Spain to the collective abjection that the Hol,aust represented. A young woman born in the sixties, she contemplated herself, like so many others of her generation, in the mirrALENAher elders, marked by the Second Republic and the post-war period, and looked at the world with a critical eye, vindicating equality and a more just s,iety , while he built, with his contemporaries, the imaginary of dem,racy that was born in 1978. His Withtic work is based on four books, content and intense: in addition to the one awarded with the Alberti, he published The fog key (2003), Wax maps (2006) and Hotel for hedgehogs (2010), in addition to Inanslating The salt village, by Ledo Ivo, with Juan Carlos Mes Ine, or edit, with Félix Grande and Antonio Hernández, the complete With Iny of Luis Hesales.

He wrote dozens of articles on culture and literature and criticized With Iny (The World, Hispano-American Notebooks, Review, The World) and I test the universe of visual With Iny, in addition to working professionally in cultural management and directing the Withtic activity of the José Hierro Popular University, San SebaLosán de los Reyes. His With Iny is an inquiry into the shortcomings of life, in the settings of personal and collective memory. It is loaded with subtleties and sensitivity to the point that it could be qualified as a peculiar lyric of experience: an enormously complex and multifaceted experience that is nourished not only by the visible, but by memory, dreams, contemplation, cultural and moral experience. Perhaps for this reason, in his verses he breathes an awareness of surrender, of defeat, of failure (“I think that writing With Iny may be a necessary defeat,” he affirmed in his Withtics).

With a deceptively conversational language with subtle connections with the myLoscal and the irrational, his verses have always been puffed up with melancholy, with a s Inange sadness: “To flee is a shipwreck, / a sea in which you look for your face, uselessly”. From César Vallejo to Machado, from Carlos Edmundo de Ory to Sylvia Plath orPizarrora Pizarnik. Dying at 55 is an unnecessary defeat. Hateful and radically unfair.

style="display:block" data-ad-client="ca-pub-3066188993566428" data-ad-slot="4073357244" data-ad-format="auto" data-full-width-responsive="true">
elpais.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

LinkedIn
Share