Friday, October 15

‘I thought better of it’: Generation Z chose not to have children | Young people


Generation Z is coming of age in the Covid crisis, with graduates and graduates facing a job crisis, an environmental crisis, and widespread social anxiety.

Your answer? According to the research, it’s about deciding not to have children so they can retire earlier and put less stress on an overcrowded planet.

One in 10 young people between the ages of 18 and 23 without children is considering not having children, according to research carried out by online pension providers Pensionbee, citing plans for early retirement as a key factor in their decision.

Marie, 23, who worked for a theater company before the pandemic, said she had decided not to have children because she could not imagine being able to pay for them without working “forever.” “I wanted to have children when I was younger, but had started to have doubts, then Covid struck. My partner and I lost our jobs and I realized that I would never have the financial security to start a family without working until I left, ”he said.

“Once we made the decision, we were very relieved,” he said. “The world of work is no longer infinite: I can see its end when I am still young enough to enjoy life.”

Sam Miller has been with her partner since she was 14 years old. “I want to be a writer and he wants to be an artist. We want a life with very few economic expenses, where we are not tied to paid work, ”he said.

The research found that twice as many men as women in all age groups said they were considering not having children in order to retire early, while those working in the arts and culture sectors were more likely to say so. they would consider any other profession. .

Young couple with piggy banks
Not having children was something that those in average or higher paying jobs were more likely to be considered. Photography: images from the UG / Alamy Stock Photo library

Not having children was something they were more likely to be considered by those on average to higher paying jobs, and those earning between £ 25,001 and £ 55,000 were more likely to claim it was something they would consider to be their lower income counterparts.

Londoners were the most likely to say they would not have children if it meant they could advance retirement, with 5% of respondents across all generations stating this. By contrast, not a single respondent in the Northeast cited not having children as a way to advance their retirement.

A growing number of people are consciously choosing to have fewer children for environmental reasons: a YouGov study Last year it found that of British adults who were not yet parents, more than a third said they never wanted to have children.

Prince harry He said that he and Meghan will have “two [children] maximum. “US Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sparked a debate last year when she raised concerns about the environmental impact of overpopulation, saying,” This leads young people to have a legitimate question: Is it okay to still have children? ” .

Jodie is 28 years old and single. “Children were previously on the agenda, but I bought my house last year and thought I would pay off my mortgage by age 48 at the latest and be able to do a part-time job for a couple of years before I retire.

“I hope to spend less than my week at work. Having children no longer fits in my schedule because the cost of raising them will mean more time to pay the mortgage, “he added.


www.theguardian.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share