Wednesday, March 27

The City Council begins the expropriation of the Las Concepcionistas hairdressing salon


New chapter in the work of the Conceptionists. First for the land that had to be excavated after the demolition of the walls and now for the solution that the City Council gives to the hairdresser on the corner of the Plaza de la Consitución.

Willy continues with the business open and claims his rights as a tenant. He appealed to the City Council so that the rehabilitation of the Convent would respect his space and the issue was even discussed at the Local Government Meeting on February 10.

Willy believes that the Local Government Board should not be the body that expropriates his rights as a tenant, but the Municipal Plenary. He also denies that the work is sufficient cause to extinguish a lease that was signed on October 31, 1972 with the religious order, which owned the convent until it was sold to the City Council. The Local Government Board responded to Willy that it cannot extend a right over a premises that is going to disappear and that the particular interest in maintaining his business in the same place should not be above the general interest behind the rehabilitation of the Convent. .

Willy rented the premises to the religious congregation on October 31, 1972 and asks that this lease be respected

With the negotiation between the City Council and the tenant exhausted, one party must now decide whether to resort to the Contentious-Administrative Court and the other whether to finally carry out the compulsory expropriation.

Carmen Yánez announced yesterday that the forced expropriation of tenant rights will be resolved shortly.

It was the response that the municipal spokesperson gave to Álvaro Vázquez, the spokesperson for United for Mérida at City Hall.

United for Mérida recalls that the City Council does not have, at the moment, the entire Concepcionistas site because the hairdresser Willy has a court ruling that supports his occupation of the premises.

“All the property of the Convent of the Conceptionists belongs to the City Council, with which they lie when they say that they do not have all the property to rehabilitate the Conceptionists,” answered Carmen Yáñez.

For the municipal spokesperson in this case there is only the interest of an individual who wants to take advantage of the administration and reproaches Álvaro Vázquez’s group for defending a private issue more than public benefits.

In his opinion, Podemos and Izquierda Unida have led the entire legislature against the advance of the city, as has already happened with the positions against Valverde Lillo’s work, with the Stone, the María Luisa theater or the Prado highway. “They are against any initiative that benefits the city,” he says.

For United for Mérida it is unwise that the City Council has already awarded the demolition of a site in which a commercial activity is still operating.

He believes that there is manifest incompetence on the part of those responsible for the contract because the demolition works will not begin until it is resolved.

“We demand that the government team suspend the procedure until the circumstances are clarified,” they sentence.


www.hoy.es

Also Read  'I would not be free to express my opinion': Philip Pullman steps down as Society of Authors president | Books

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *