Sunday, June 20

The proposed expansion of the college football playoff gives the NCAA a dozen reasons to reduce the regular season by one game

In pursuit of another college football playoff championship, Alabama will face such demanding opponents as Florida, Texas A&M and LSU. The Tide will also play Mercer, who finished his previous season in fifth place in the Southern Conference.

Georgia will face Charleston Southern, which lost its most recent game to an SEC opponent by 62 points. Oklahoma is ready for a game against the Western Carolina Catamounts, who finished six games under .500 in 2019. This is how it often happens in the twelfth game of college football, which is as essential to the sport as training. ” flying wedge “.

Yes, it is true: it should be prohibited.

MORE: How the Newly Proposed 12-Team College Football Playoff Would Work

It was in 2005 that the NCAA board of directors executed one of the most egregious money grabs in the history of college sports, which we all know speaks volumes. There was no good reason to approve the expansion of the college football regular season to 12 games, other than to get an additional gateway for energy programs.

And now there is less reason to leave it that way if the sport’s leaders are serious about expanding the playoff structure to include 12 teams and potentially four games for participating teams.

The late Myles Brand was a good man and an effective leader for the NCAA during his presidency, but it’s hard to believe he managed not to laugh when he defended the expansion of the schedule by stating: “The season will not be lengthened; it just means that the bye week would be eliminated. “

There were also comical discussions in newspaper reports about the growth of the calendar suggesting that there could be more high-level games other than conferences as a result, perhaps even between geographic rivals. Pitt and Penn State have played four times in the 15 seasons since then.

No, this always had to do with money. It’s not a small amount, and each FBS school participated in that revenue growth in their own way, either by playing an additional game at home if they possessed that programming power, or by traveling for a guaranteed payout.

MORE: How a 12-team CFP would have worked in 2020

The proposed expansion of the tiebreaker to 12 teams triples the number of teams involved and more than triples the inventory of championship games. The champions of the six highest rated conferences will get an automatic bid, which means that at least one team from outside of the “Autonomy Five” conferences will be represented.

This means that there will be a drastically expanded income pool beginning with the postseason, in terms of television income and entry receipts. And the assurance in this system that all conferences will have, in a sense, a representative, means that all conferences, in a sense, will share that abundance.

There has been a huge backlash from the public about the impertinence of stretching the season for teams entering a 12-team CFP to 16 or 17 games, which would be the number if a team reaches the final with or without a bye. . And, at first glance, those who have spoken out against that concept are right.

However, your concerns can be resolved simply and painlessly, with a one-page piece of NCAA legislation that could be approved by the board of directors.

The twelfth game has to go.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *