The 11-M Association Affected by Terrorism and the Unit for Attention and Assessment of Victims of Terrorism have presented a appeal against the sentence for the attacks on Las Ramblas in Barcelona and Cambrils (Tarragona) of 2017 so that two convicts are considered co-authors of the same.
The National Court sentenced 53 years in prison to Mohamed Houli, who was injured in the explosion of the house in Alcanar (Tarragona) where the terrorists made explosive devices, and 46 years in prison to Driss Oukabir, who rented the van with which the mass accident was committed in Las Ramblas on the afternoon of August 17, 2017.
In addition, he imposed eight years in prison on Said Ben Iazza for collaboration, since he lent his documentation and a van to buy and transport explosive devices.
To the first two, the sentence attributes crimes of belonging to a terrorist organization, possession, storage and manufacture of explosive devices and damage in an attempt of a terrorist nature in competition with 29 crimes of injuries due to serious negligence.
The terrorist action on Las Ramblas took place after the night of the previous day, on August 16, 2017, the house in Alcanar, used by the terrorist cell supposedly formed by Abdelbaki Es Satty, who was Ripoll’s magnet, exploded. one of the two deceased in this event.
After the attack on Las Ramblas in the early morning of the following day, August 18, the Mossos d’Esquadra in Cambrils killed the five terrorists from the cell who attacked people on the seafront and on the 21st the perpetrator of the Las Ramblas, Younes Abouyaaqoub, on a path in Subirats (Barcelona).
16 dead and 140 wounded
The attacks on Las Ramblas in Barcelona and the promenade caused 16 deaths and 140 wounded.
In a statement, the Association 11-M Affected of Terrorism, which in the trial requested reviewable permanent prison for Mohamed Houli and Driss Oukabir, stresses that “there is clear evidence” to condemn them as co-perpetrators of the attacks and adds that “justice cannot look the other way.”
It explains that for this reason the prosecution brought by the largest number of victims of these attacks has filed an appeal with the Appeals Chamber of the National High Court.
The appeal insists that the participation of Driss Oukabir and Mohamed Houli was essential for the consummation of the attacks.
That is why this accusation maintains that both are authors as accomplices or necessary cooperators of the crimes of terrorist murders and injuries committed by their deceased cellmates, “to whom they contributed essential elements for the commission of the attacks.”
However, it admits the account of proven facts and congratulates the Chamber for having as victims of terrorism all those affected by these attacks.
But “the appeal is also extended to report the specific situation of certain victims who have not even obtained a forensic report on their injuries in some cases,” concludes the 11-M Association Affected by Terrorism.
Eddie is an Australian news reporter with over 9 years in the industry and has published on Forbes and tech crunch.